In the News

  • June 2018
    The SAS decision was an unfortunate misstep on the part of the Supreme Court of the US

    SAS Institute v Iancu ended the PTAB’s practice of partial institution for inter partes review (IPR) proceedings.

    www.intellectualpropertymagazine.comIntellectual Property Magazine
  • June 13, 2018
    Judge allows journalist to challenge claimed inclusion on U.S. drone ‘kill list’

    “We are gratified that the court recognized that, as a U.S. citizen, Mr. Kareem has the right to be heard in court before his government can decide to kill him, and we look forward to these proceedings continuing to a final resolution,” said Tara J. Plochocki, partner with the Lewis Baach Kaufmann Middlemiss law firm.

    www.washingtonpost.comWashington Post
  • May 17, 2018

    Non-US insurers with exposures to Iran-related business face a difficult six months to bring their business into compliance with US president Donald Trump’s newly reinstated snap-back sanctions

    www.insuranceday.comInsurance Day
  • May 17, 2018

    A government coverup of the Cohen reports “makes no sense,” said Aaron Wolfson, a lawyer who previously oversaw suspicious activity reporting for JPMorgan Chase. “I find that laughable.”

    www.washingtonpost.comWashington Post
  • May 16, 2018
    www.indystar.comIndy Star
  • May 1, 2018

    Plaintiffs attorney Tara J. Plochocki likened the case instead to challenges from people who say they were wrongly placed on U.S. no-fly lists or hit with economic sanctions. The men were also represented by Reprieve, a human rights group based in London and New York City.

    Plochocki argued that when Awlaki’s father tried to sue on his son’s behalf while he was still alive, another federal judge in Washington in 2010 ruled that nothing prevented the designated terrorist Awlaki from peacefully presenting himself at a U.S. embassy and asserting his rights in court.

    “We’re taking [the judge] up on that offer,” Plochocki said, such as by asserting their innocence in a sworn affidavit, court filing, administrative hearing or other means.

    www.washingtonpost.comWashington Post
  • May 1, 2018
    US Pushes for Deference Regarding Americans on Kill List

    Tara Plochocki of the firm Lewis Baach noted that her clients do not seek review of the legality of the drone program, and are only seeking narrow due-process relief afforded by the Administrative Procedure Act.

    “Plaintiffs want an opportunity to be meaningfully heard,” she said.

    www.courthousenews.comCourthouse News
  • March 26, 2018
    Aeroflot allegedly told US citizens they faced being 'deported' to Delhi after connecting flight from Moscow to New York cancelled

    The complaint was filed to the US Department of Transportation (DOT) by civil rights legal organisation Muslim Advocates and litigation specialist law firm Lewis Baach…Waleed Nassar, a partner in Lewis Baach, said: “This complaint is to ensure that a clear and unequivocal message is sent worldwide to any airline that chooses to contract with United States citizens and to offer flights to the United States: discrimination against any United States citizen on any basis – be it racial, religious, perceived ethnic origin or sexual orientation – is simply unacceptable and will not be tolerated.”
  • March 22, 2018

    Erika Levin has been recognized as a member of the 2018 International Arbitration Law360 editorial advisory board whose purpose is to provide feedback on Law360's coverage and gain insight from experts in the field on how best to shape future coverage.

  • March 19, 2018

    “The SEC’s latest settlement with Voya Financial is another example of the SEC’s trend over the past few years to crack down on conflicts of interest and breaches of fiduciary duty,” said Lewis Baach partner Jason Berland.

    ©2018 ACA Insight and ACA Compliance Group. All rights reserved. Reproduced with written permission of the publisher.

    ACA Insight
  • February 28, 2018

    “We are very pleased that the Board ruled in favor of WAG in these IPRs,” Abramson told Law360 via email. “The rulings reflect that the real party-in-interest and privity provisions in 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) constitute a serious limitation on the time frame available for interrelated parties to challenge patents through inter partes review.”

  • February 14, 2018

    Manuel Varela, especializado en derecho penal en Washington, cree que las consecuencias de este caso para el grupo español pueden ser "gravísimas"
  • February 13, 2018

    “We are pleased to have several claims that have survived IPR attack, such that Makor’s patent infringement case in the district court can go forward at least as to those claims,” Ron Abramson, an attorney for Makor, told Law360 on Tuesday. “As I am sure you are aware, current statistics show that the large majority of instituted IPRs result in invalidation of all challenged claims. We are pleased to be in the exception to that rule in the present cases.”

    [Makor is represented by Ronald Abramson and Ari J. Jaffess ]

  • February 13, 2018

    If the patent owner can make the case that there is a factual issue about whether the invention is conventional, "that'll almost always get you out of summary judgment," said Ronald Abramson of Lewis Baach Kaufmann Middlemiss PLLC. "This opens up a big can of worms to avoid summary judgment."

  • January 31, 2018

    Recent brain studies investigating CTE create uncertainty for defendants and their insurers

    page 7Insurance Day
  • January 15, 2018

    Criminals are opportunists. They like money. There’s a ton of money in college basketball. And, as evidenced by the federal criminal charges against 10 people, including four Division I NCAA men’s basketball assistant coaches and a senior executive at a major athletic apparel company, no one seems to keep a particularly close eye on that money — and pots of unsupervised money create attractive opportunities.

    www.sportsdaily.comSports Business Journal
  • December 18, 2017

    Erika Levin told Law360 that the decision is interesting because it shows the increasing attention being paid to "phase two" of arbitrations: the enforcement stage. That's important since arbitration awards were traditionally viewed as final and binding, with very little opportunity to overturn them once they're issued.

    The decision is particularly interesting since Brazilian courts have traditionally been perceived to be very pro-arbitration and deferential, she said.

    "You're starting to see more activity in phase two, the second act of the arbitration," she said. “Parties need to be mindful that multiple jurisdictions could be involved in an enforcement strategy, and that the results could differ drastically depending on the jurisdictions involved.”

  • December 12, 2017

    Eric Lewis is quoted saying, “The ability to understand a case, price a case, look at a case honestly and evaluate its strengths and weaknesses becomes more important.”

  • December 11, 2017
  • November 13, 2017

    Mr. Francos* was quoted in the article saying, “If someone received a bribe, then someone had to have paid the bribe,” he said. “Companies should be well prepared [to be investigated].” He continued to say, many Argentinian companies that are contracted by the state do not have established policies in terms of compliance and integrity, and will likely rush to put together new compliance programmes. Francos said “this shock could be good” to improve standards quickly.  “This [scenario] creates a problem for companies, but also an opportunity that will bring change to Argentina’s business culture,” he said.

    *Mr. Francos is admitted to practice only in Buenos Aires; not engaged in the practice of law in the District of Columbia. 

    www.globalinvestigationsreview.comGlobal Investigations Review
  • September 28, 2017

    Katherine Toomey was interviewed about the President’s latest travel ban proclamation and observed that the new ban might signal future “policy changes and reciprocal restrictions on U.S. travel.”  She added I think that what we're seeing is uncertainty in the future about how many foreigners may be able to come over here for business purposes, whether for hiring or meetings or conferences and the extent to which that will have to be navigated by general counsels."

  • September 11, 2017
    New York Post reports FBI evidence in a lawsuit alleges Saudi Arabia's US embassy may have funded test run for Sept 11.

    Waleed Nassar, an international disputes lawyer who represents two Saudi charities that are defendants in 9/11 litigation alongside Saudi Arabia, said, "the evidence, along with much of what has been submitted, is innuendo and circumstantial".

    "The plaintiff's burden is to show something more direct, and that's really the only hope they have to have Saudi Arabia remain in the litigation," Nassar said. 

  • August 16, 2017

    Woodsford Litigation Funding, one of the leading global third party funders, has announced a funding facility agreement with Lewis Baach which ensures the firm can offer clients an expedited, one-stop arrangement for the financing of high value litigation and arbitration.

  • August 16, 2017
    www.americanlawyer.comThe American Lawyer
  • August 16, 2017

    Third-party funder Woodsford Litigation Funding said Wednesday it has reached a $20 million agreement with law firm Lewis Baach Kaufmann Middlemiss PLLC to provide it with financing to pursue litigation and arbitration worldwide on behalf of the firm's clients.

    The deal, referred to as a funding facility agreement, will allow Lewis Baach to offer clients a financing arrangement to cover matters in any jurisdiction around the world in which the firm is prepared to offer contingency fee arrangements, Woodsford said. The deal will also cover situations...

    “In our experience, the resources and the resolve that Woodsford brings to the equation, combined with a strong claim, a determined client, and a formidable legal team, makes the difference between justice delivered or denied,” Liston said.

  • August 15, 2017

    "The ability to understand a case, price a case and look at a case honestly — to evaluate its strengths and weaknesses — becomes more important," said Eric Lewis of  Lewis Baach Kaufmann Middlemiss PLLC. "I spend more time on strategy than I did 10 to 15 years ago. I spend more time talking to clients as cases go along."

  • July 27, 2017

    A little more than a year ago, the Pentagon lifted its ban on transgender people serving openly in the military, noted Elizabeth Marvin, an attorney with Lewis Baach in Washington, D.C. Reversing the decision "will undoubtedly adversely impact transgender service members who are currently serving openly under the Obama-era policy," she said. 


    HR should be aware that Trump's decision "will impassion people on both sides of the issue. Managers need to be educated about transgender issues, and companies should adopt a zero-tolerance policy regarding harassment of transgender employees," Marvin said. "Work should be a place where transgender employees feel safe and are not judged."

    www.shrm.orgSociety for Human Resource Management
  • June 28, 2017

    In September 2016, the US Congress passed the Justice Against State Sponsors of Terrorism Act (“JASTA”) into law, overriding President Obama’s veto to narrow the scope of foreign sovereign immunity for terrorism related claims and expanding liability under the Anti-Terrorism Act (“ATA”) to now also include those who ‘aid, abet, or conspire’ with a foreign terrorist organisation. JASTA’s twin expansions of liability now make it easier to hook Middle Eastern countries and institutions into the web of costly US litigation. As President Obama himself recognised as a basis for his veto, ‘courts [can] potentially consider even minimal allegations…sufficient to open the door to litigation and wide-ranging discovery…’

    Lexis Middle East Law