Overview
Marc Frazier Scholl’s career as a public servant in law enforcement spanned nearly four decades, both as a criminal prosecutor with the District Attorney, New York County and as an investigator of public corruption with the Inspector General of the State of New York. At the District Attorney’s office he was a senior assistant whose career spanned the Appeals, Trial, and Investigation Divisions. His last role there was as Senior Investigative Counsel investigating and prosecuting complex white collar criminal activity, many of national and international note, as well as Counsel to the Investigation Division, providing advice and direction to his colleagues in pursuing investigations. His 35-year career with the office, appearing in federal and state courts, involved primary roles in hundreds of appellate and trial court cases. For several years, he was also the director of civil litigation there, in which role he supervised and appeared in numerous state and federal civil litigation involving civil rights, tort, habeas corpus, subpoenas, and discovery disputes.
Mr. Scholl also spent two years as chief of investigations for the New York City office of the New York State Inspector General, responsible for supervising and investigating misconduct of state officials.
Professional Affiliations
- New York State Bar Association
- New York City Bar Association
Experience
- Appeals Bureau, New York County District Attorney’s Office (1978-1983; 1986-1999)
- Trial Division, New York County District Attorney’s Office (1983-1986)
- Director of Civil Litigation Unit, New York County District Attorney’s Office (1986-1999)
- Investigation Division, Senior Investigative Counsel, New York County District Attorney’s Office (1999-2001; 2002-2017)
- Counsel to the Investigation Division, New York County District Attorney’s Office (2010-2017)
- Chief of Investigations, New York City, Inspector General, State of New York (2001-2002)
Representative Matters
- Investigated and tried the major executives of a $40 billion-a-year company who stole more than $150 million from a public company. Three officers and directors were convicted, two after trial, including its CEO and CFO who received significant prison sentences and repaid hundreds of millions of dollars in restitution and fines. During trial, the Financial Times reported, using a sports analogy, that Mr. Scholl was the “player that every team covets . . . and . . . has proved himself time and again as the prosecution’s workhorse.”
- Tried four defendants accused of stealing nearly six million dollars from Columbia University, diverting the funds to them through computer fraud. All four were convicted after trial and sentenced to prison terms, and a substantial amount of the stolen funds were recovered and returned.
- Investigated a virtual currency fraud against Southeast Asia-based operators of websites promising significant returns on virtual currency investments. The result was the seizure and closure of over 70 domains used by the operators to defraud their victims.
- Investigated a public company in the video gaming business for falsely dating stock options to increase officer compensation. The illegal technique effectively increased the officers’ compensation by millions of dollars. As a result of the investigation the company’s CEO and its chief legal officer and chief accounting officer were all convicted of crimes and improperly-obtained compensation was repaid to the company. This was the first criminal conviction, nationwide, for a stock backdating scheme.
- Investigated an international securities fraud scheme which hoodwinked victims, primarily Australian and New Zealand citizens, into investing in worthless non-public securities, with the funds being laundered through the New York and the United States. The investigation obtained the return of an American citizen living in Thailand who was prosecuted and sentenced to state prison, and the extradition from Thailand of a Canadian cohort, also convicted and sentenced to state prison.
- Investigated a loan scheme by which the Canadian CEO and CFO of a public company fraudulently induced a Swiss subsidiary of a venerated British bank to lend them tens of millions of dollars. By the end of the investigation the evidence showed that the same CEO and CFO had defrauded investors through false claims inflating the value of the company’s stock, that an American citizen had used off-shore companies to illegally obtain securities at artificially low prices, and that two bank officers had colluded to mislead their superiors in Switzerland to make loans to these bank clients. The Canadian CEO and CFO, the American investor, and the two bank employees were all convicted of their crimes.
- Investigated, working with federal and global law enforcement colleagues, money laundering and fraud at the infamous Bank of Credit and Commerce International, a global institution with a presence in 70 countries. The result of the widely-publicized investigation was criminal convictions for the bank, officers of the bank, and other individuals, as well as $1.6 billion being recovered.
- Investigated, prosecuted, and convicted a security guard company and its principal for stealing more than one million dollars in a sales tax fraud.
- Investigated, prosecuted, and convicted the principals of a fraudulent precious metals investment scheme that victimized over 150 people in the United States and Canada.
- Investigated, prosecuted, and convicted the chief operating officer of a hedge fund management company for embezzling a quarter million dollars from a fund he managed and utilizing forged documents to cover up the theft.
- Represented the interests of the Manhattan District Attorney in connection to a federal constitutional challenge to applying New York’s assisted suicide statute to physicians, including briefing and arguing the case before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals and counseling the state attorney general who successfully represented the state’s interests before the United States Supreme Court.
- Represented, successfully, a trial prosecutor sued for defamation by a medical examiner, who alleged that the prosecutor had communicated to colleagues that the medical examiner was misstating his credentials. The court granted the prosecutor summary judgment.
- Represented, successfully, the government in connection with several post-conviction proceedings and appeals brought by Black Liberation Army assassins of two New York City police officers. Of note, a media network was granted permission to videotape a multi-day evidentiary hearing in federal court.
Publications & Events
- Panelist and Presenter, "The Responsibilities and Potential Liabilities of Those in Compliance"Thirty-Fourth International Symposium on Economic CrimeCambridge, UK, September 2016
- Co-author, "Criminal Prosecution Under New York State's Martin Act"LJN Business Crimes Bulletin, Vol. 18, Number 1, September 2010
- Panelist and Presenter, "A Searching Inquiry into Failures of Corporate Ethics: WorldCom, Tyco, and HealthSouth"Medtronic Business and Law RoundtableMinneapolis, MN, November 2006
In the News
"The government is charging Trump not for his abuse of presidential power but for his alleged criminal conduct as a candidate who seeks to alter the results of an election and also who seeks to bring the vice president into the corrupt cabal," Marc Scholl said.
Law360, August 28, 2024"It's always wise for the defendant not to rant about unfairness and innocence if he wants to get any sort of leniency at sentence," Marc Scholl of Lewis Baach Kaufmann Middlemiss PLLC, a former prosecutor in the New York County District Attorney's Office, told Law360.
Law360, May 31, 2024Marc Frazier Scholl commented in the New York Times on New York's prohibition against jurors being provided with a copy of the written legal instructions.
The New York Times, May 30, 2024Marc Frazier Scholl, commenting in the New York Times, discussed the complex instructions given to jurors in Donald Trump's criminal trial.
New York Times, May 29, 2024Marc Frazier Scholl was quoted in the New York Times commenting on the prosecution's opening statement in the criminal trial of Donald Trump.
The New York Times, May 4, 2024The prosecutor's pending request represents "an additional remedy that the judge could use to cajole compliance," noted former New York prosecutor Marc Scholl of Lewis Baach Kaufmann Middlemiss PLLC.
The judge might also deny the request and warn Trump that, if he violates the gag order again, he could face cross-examination on the issue, which "should encourage a reasonable person to avoid a further contempt finding and provide Trump with ample notice to modulate his behavior," Scholl said.
Law360, May 1, 2024Marc Scholl was quoted in Law360 on defense attorney Todd Blanche's opening arguments in Donald Trump's criminal hush-money trial.
Law360, April 22, 2024If Trump were to try to blame Cohen during the hush money trial, prosecutors could argue that Trump should have known that his attorney "might ignore the law" based on Cohen's history, according to former New York prosecutor Marc Scholl of Lewis Baach Kaufmann Middlemiss PLLC.
Law360, March 14, 2024Taking a backseat to Bragg's case also carries potential risks for Smith. Having the hush money trial go first could "put less pressure on the Supreme Court to handle the D.C. Circuit immunity appeal quickly," former New York prosecutor Marc Scholl of Lewis Baach Kaufmann Middlemiss PLLC told Law360.
Law360, February 21, 2024"As an overall matter, this is an exhaustive opinion that dissects and rejects Trump's arguments," former New York prosecutor Marc Scholl of Lewis Baach Kaufmann Middlemiss PLLC told Law360.
The 57-page opinion "makes plain the irony implicit in a president, whose solemn constitutional duty is to take care that the laws of this country be 'faithfully executed,' seeking to make himself the sole exception from obeying the law," Scholl added.
Law360, February 6, 2024- Business Insider, January 2024
Former New York prosecutor Marc Scholl told Law360 that Judge Chutkan is "well-equipped" to make calls on whether Trump violated either of the requirements in question in the gag order based on the statements themselves, the "context in which any potentially violative statements are made, and any evidence that the parties wish to present."
Law360, December 12, 2023Trump's anticipated appeal would go to the intermediate New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, First Department, which has the "extraordinary power to review not just the law, but also the facts," Scholl noted.
While it would be "unusual" for the First Department to "overrule a credibility finding of the trial judge, who is acting as judge and jury," the appellate court could "find the facts differently from Justice Engoron," he added.
Law360, November 15, 2023"Unlike in the last case, here, the government is alleging substantial payments made to Menendez and his wife in the form of cash, gold bars, and other direct gifts, such as a luxury car, by three businessmen," Scholl said. "Further, the government is alleging that it has better proof of direct things that Menendez and his wife did for those who paid them."
USA Today, September 23, 2023- USA Today, September 13, 2023
- USA Today, September 10, 2023
Marc Scholl told Law360 that because the "evidence could be viewed to show that Avenatti threatened to ruin Nike's reputation for personal gain, the extortion counts were necessarily affirmed."
Law360, August 30, 2023- Law360, August 11, 2023
Rudy Giuliani's admission that he falsely accused two Georgia poll workers of rigging the 2020 election likely won't shield him from discovery requests in the defamation case and could even aid federal prosecutors in their election-interference probe of former President Donald Trump, experts say.
Marc Scholl of Lewis Baach Kaufmann Middlemiss PLLC [said], "It raises questions as to why Giuliani made these concessions and what discovery material that Giuliani has failed to produce may hold as to his culpability and the culpability of others, including Trump."
Law360, July 27, 2023"Willful blindness"? Marc Frazier Scholl was quoted in Law360 discussing potential arguments and counterarguments in the event Donald Trump is indicted in relation to the January 6 investigation.
Law360, July 18, 2023"Not surprisingly, Trump's filing mentions no particular support to any challenge other than Trump wants to make a challenge," Marc Scholl of Lewis Baach Kaufmann Middlemiss PLLC said.
Law360, July 11, 2023- USA Today, June 9, 2023
- Trump can run in 2024 even if charged in classified documents case | Fact checkUSA Today, June 5, 2023
“My view is that while the law allows the prosecutor to play it close to the vest, it seems that best practice and fairness requires they reveal — to the extent they know — what the crimes are,” said Marc F. Scholl, who served in the district attorney’s office for nearly four decades in both trial and senior investigative roles. “And because it’s a matter of such public interest,” he added of the Trump case, “you really want to show the world you’re not hiding anything.”
The New York Times, May 7, 2023Marc Scholl, a former prosecutor in the Manhattan DA's office, said that while Trump had a chance of success, it was more likely that the case would be sent back to state court.
"At the end of the day, New York is not trying to prosecute him for a federal crime or for anything he did in connection with his presidential duties," Scholl said. "But it's certainly a potential delaying tactic."
Reuters, May 4, 2023- USA Today, April 11, 2023
Marc Scholl, a former prosecutor in the Manhattan district attorney's office, told Reuters that Trump being given an opportunity to testify suggests that the grand jury had heard evidence implicating him in a crime. "The invitation should mean the prosecutor is preparing to seek criminal charges."
Reuters, March 9, 2023- Business Insider, May 5, 2022
- Business Insider, April 6, 2022
- Reuters, July 1, 2021
- Law360, July 10, 2020
- An examination of New York’s new criminal discovery laws, specifically the new CPL article 245 which provides that significant, enumerated disclosures be made to the defense within specified time periods.New York Law Journal, July 6, 2020
- New York Law Journal, June 12, 2020
- Law360, October 6, 2019
Practice Areas
Education
- Georgetown University Law Center (J.D. May 1978 Magna Cum Laude), American Criminal Law Review, Topics Editor; Barristers' Council Law Fellow, 1976-77
- SUNY-Binghamton (B.A. May 1975)
Bar Admissions
- New York
- U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
- U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
- United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
- United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
- United States Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
- United States Supreme Court